maki-harukawa:

mymelibe:

ericjdraws-reblogs:

fragisbeardv2:

mymelibe:

does bl*zzard have one female model that they just kind of tweak every time they make a new female character or am i just a hater

i wanted to make a comparison to the readily unmasked male heroes on the official overwatch website’s hero roster, but as far as the male heroes who have *unmasked* skins, the diversity only widens.

and we must include torbjorn, both for his unique facial features and also unique body type/stature

and although roadhog remains masked his body type compared to the other male heroes, even to reinhardt who matches roadhog in height, is VERY unique

whereas new female heroes get small tweaks in their facial features and body types, the male heroes’ scope of diversity is a lot wilder in comparison, which sucks and isn’t really fair.

you are probably the only person on this post who has actually compared the male characters to the female characters and i thank you so much. people just keep bringing up the same 2 or 3 female characters (including orisa??for some reason?) who have slight variations in their faces/bodies as some kind of gotcha without realizing how vastly the male characters vary in comparison to the female characters. 

its because blizzard sees being a woman as diverse enough

lilbittydragon:

thegirlwiththepurpleguitar:

kedreeva:

Soulmates are not your ~other half~, that’s just nonsense. You are a whole person already, not half a person. A soulmate isn’t even inherently romantic. A soulmate is just the other sock in a matched set. You’re still a whole, complete sock on your own, you are perfectly functional paired with any other sock, it’s just that it’s even better when you match. A soulmate is literally just the person who makes your soul go “!!! Same hat!!!” and wave excitedly.

i love this

this is literally the only interpretation of “soulmate” that I can tolerate or accept 

faeforge:

thedarksideoflimbo:

Three things I find hilarious about this:

1: Jeff Goode goes to Furry Cons

2: Disney acknowledges and prepares show creators that their show will, most definitely, become porn.

3: Disney has examples on hand of how said show will, most definitely, become porn.

Pffft!!!!!

Disney doesn’t just have examples of said porn!!

Ok story time. Yeaaaars ago i dated an animator chick. During that short time together we ran around a lot and met a bunch of industry people in our area.

One of them used to work for Disney. So we are hanging out at his apartment and conversation being what it is he kinda says “hold on” and goes off to dig in the closet. He comes back and sets down a couple STACKS (and im talking foot high) of printer paper.

What followed were a couple hours of hysterical laughing as we paged through “a history of Disney animation- porn edition”

See Disney has this weird rule in their artist contracts- everything you create while in their employ is THEIRS. Even in the off time. Its one of the reasons they are reviled in the industry. But the rule was set in place to basically steal good ideas from their staff or force them to ONLY work on Disney ip’s while employed.

The jokes on them though. They didn’t count on most artists being giant perverts (this story is also why i laugh when people tell me drawing smut will ‘ruin your art career’)

So! Disney being bastards ended up earning them smut of everything they’ve ever created. And also per their policies they had to keep it. Every artist knew about the smut vault and our buddy here had photocopied a chunk of it. Yes… 2-3 feet of smut was just a chunk of it.

Snow white? Rescue rangers? Goofy? Minnie? Micky? Beauty and the beast? Aladdin? Yup you name it it was there. Some of it was mild. The topless little mermaid stuff made sense at least. Some was raunchy as hell. ALL OF IT in the animation style of the films and shows.

So yes, not only does Disney know there will be porn, have the porn, but they have official porn.

You’re welcome.